Comparison
آهنگیفای vs Леонардо Дайвинчик
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @ahangify | @leoday |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 4.2M | 5.5M |
| Avg views | 338,524 | 158,000 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 2.9% |
| 30-day growth | +0.3% | +0.8% |
| Language | فارسی | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@ahangify
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@leoday
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.