Comparison
Liseli Türbanlı Arayış vs Yerli Pornosu Türk Pornoları
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @ifsa11_turk | @sohbetlerw |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 23,120 | 13,081 |
| Avg views | 20,205 | 12,853 |
| Engagement rate | 87.4% | 98.3% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | Türkçe | Türkçe |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 364 days | 135 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@ifsa11_turk
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@sohbetlerw
Questionable
- Telegram flags this channel (scam, fake or restricted)
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.