Comparison
全球笔记 全球曝光 全球华人 曝光头条 曝光新闻 曝光日记 vs Vidogram
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @qqbj_bg | @vidogram |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 15,502 | 2.2M |
| Avg views | 9,419 | 3.6M |
| Engagement rate | 60.8% | 160.9% |
| 30-day growth | — | -3.2% |
| Language | 中文 | English |
| Category | news | retail |
| Channel age | 3956 days | 2670 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@qqbj_bg
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@vidogram
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.